
Legal Roadblock Delays Michael Jackson Biopic

The creation of the Michael Jackson biopic, titled Michael, has been thrust into turmoil after producers discovered legal constraints related to a decades-old agreement. Directed by Antoine Fuqua and featuring Jaafar Jackson, Michael Jackson's nephew, in the lead role, the film aims to delve into the complexities of Jackson’s life, both personal and professional. However, the film's third act has become a point of contention due to its focus on the allegations made by Jordan Chandler in 1993, which alleged sexual misconduct by Jackson.
These legal issues stem from a previous agreement between Jackson's estate and the Chandler family, prohibiting the dramatization of their experiences or likenesses in any medium, including film. This revelation surfaced only after the principal photography wrapped, creating a predicament for the filmmakers. The Michael Jackson estate, deeply involved in the production, was reportedly unaware of this restriction until recent reports unveiled that the estate had maintained this agreement when settling with the family years ago. As a result, substantial reshoots and script rewrites are required, escalating the film's budget and causing a significant delay in its release, originally scheduled for April 2025 but now postponed to October of the same year.
The biopic's intended narrative was to portray the allegations, which initially led to a criminal investigation that was later settled out of court with the Chandlers for $20 million. The film's script depicted Jackson as a victim of a financial extortion plot, with his innocence unequivocally portrayed. This storyline, now un-filmable without legal repercussions, was set as a central theme, making the producers scramble to find an alternative by reworking entire sections of the script. This issue not only throws the film's release into question but also challenges the storytelling approach taken by Fuqua and screenwriter John Logan.
Despite the challenges, the estate has pledged financial support for the reshoots and script alterations. The project's key figures, including Fuqua, Logan, and Academy Award-winning producer Graham King, are presently revising the script to comply with legal requirements. They face the daunting task of delivering a new version that retains the film's integrity and plans to submit it for approval to both Lionsgate, the U.S. distributor, and Universal, responsible for international distribution.
The film, initially seen as an Oscar contender due to King’s previous success with Bohemian Rhapsody, may lose its anticipated accolades if the storyline loses its core dramatic conflict. Furthermore, the fallout from the intended portrayal could impact public perception and the film's eventual reception. There is also a lingering public opinion battle, exacerbated by critics such as Dan Reed, director of Leaving Neverland. Reed argued that the biopic could potentially glorify a narrative dismissive of the pain experienced by alleged victims of Jackson, thereby reigniting past controversies surrounding the King of Pop.
While the project has found itself in an unenviable position, the commitment from the Michael Jackson estate to resolve the issue indicates that the film could still see the light of day. Moving forward, the project leaders must navigate these complications judiciously, ensuring compliance with legal stipulations while preserving the narrative intent as much as legally permissible.
Key Takeaways
-
www.stereogum.com | The Michael Jackson biopic 'Michael' directed by Antoine Fuqua must reshoot its entire third act due to a contractual agreement about the depiction of the Chandler family.
-
screenrant.com | The Jackson estate agreed to fund the necessary reshoots for the biopic 'Michael', with the film's budget reported at $150 million.
-
www.thedailybeast.com | Jaafar Jackson stars as Michael Jackson in the biopic, which aims to address the allegations against Jackson head-on, unlike previous portrayals.
-
www.thedailybeast.com | Lawyers of Jackson's accusers have criticized the upcoming film as 'propaganda', dealing with its portrayal of Jackson's legal battles and public allegations.