Steven Tyler, Accuser Julia Holcomb Clash Over Abortion Evidence Ahead of Trial

Aerosmith singer Steven Tyler and his accuser Julia Holcomb are locked in a pretrial fight over what evidence jurors will be permitted to hear, according to newly filed court documents. At issue is whether two abortions Holcomb underwent in the 1970s can be introduced during the upcoming trial in her sexual abuse case against Tyler.

Holcomb has alleged that Tyler abused her sexually when she was a teenager during the 1970s, stating that their relationship began when she was 16. Tyler has denied any wrongdoing in connection with her claims.

What the Court Filings Say About the 1975 and 1979 Abortions

Tyler’s attorneys are seeking to keep any mention of a 1975 abortion out of the trial entirely. Their argument is that the procedure took place in Massachusetts, after Holcomb had already turned 18, and therefore has no bearing on the alleged sexual conduct that occurred in California.

Tyler’s side has acknowledged that the 1975 pregnancy would have been his own child. His legal team has said that if the judge decides to let jurors hear about that abortion anyway, Tyler wants the option to also present evidence of a second abortion Holcomb had in 1979, during a pregnancy involving a different man.

• Holcomb alleges the relationship with Tyler began when she was 16 years old, in the 1970s.
• The 1975 abortion occurred in Massachusetts, after Holcomb turned 18.
• The 1979 abortion involved a pregnancy with another man’s child.
• A ruling from the judge on the evidence dispute has not yet been issued.

Why Tyler’s Lawyers Want the Second Abortion Included

According to the filings, Holcomb has described the 1975 abortion as deeply traumatic and has pointed to it as a source of the emotional distress damages she is pursuing in the lawsuit. Tyler’s attorneys argue that if that claim is allowed to stand before the jury, fairness requires that the 1979 abortion also be introduced so jurors have full context.

The filings also note that Holcomb has appeared as a speaker within anti-abortion circles, where she discussed regret over having undergone an abortion in general terms rather than tying those remarks specifically to the 1975 procedure. Tyler’s lawyers contend this broader history is relevant to understanding her emotional distress claims.

Tyler’s legal team has argued that because Holcomb has acknowledged both abortions were traumatic for her, the 1979 procedure could represent an alternative explanation for her alleged emotional and mental distress, separate from anything connected to Tyler. As of the latest filings, the judge overseeing the case had not yet ruled on whether either abortion can be presented to the jury.

More Info

• Aerosmith Steven Tyler’s Accuser Fighting to Keep Abortion Evidence Out of Court | TMZ Music